On Saturday, the US and Israel launched Operation Fury, a coordinated strike on several Iranian sites. This strike was justified to us citizens as a “defensive” strike, since Iran is only days away from having a nuclear weapon, even though this exact statement has been said by congress for over twenty years.
In fact, the US claimed the same thing about Iraq in 2003 and used the public fear of nuclear weapons (coined to the media then as WMDs) to gain public support of an invasion there. I was a part of the generation that grew up during this war, and when the Senate report on it was finally released that showed that Iraq never had any WMDs, it was hard not to feel like we were all conned into supporting something that wasn’t justified.
I will admit that growing up in that generation has affected my ability to justify war. I understand that war is an economy that pays a lot of bills for a lot of people, but I also understand that there are a lot of young men and women serving our country who pay a far greater price for the decision of war, and I don’t trust many of the people in power to truly understand the sacrifices that they are asking their people to make. Not to mention the greater threat of danger to civilians in our country and elsewhere during wartime.
To sum up that last paragraph, I am not anti-war, but I believe we need to have an extremely good reason to justify endangering the lives of our people. Do I think we have that in this case? No.
North Korea has nuclear weapons and absolutely hates our country, yet we don’t bat an eye at them. This is because we know that just having nuclear weapons alone is not a threat to us. Why? Because the technology to make nuclear weapons isn’t nearly as hard as the logistics of launching one thousands of miles across the ocean. The only countries who have ICBMs (the long range missiles that are capable of reaching us, in theory) are Russia, China, and interestingly enough, North Korea as of 2017. And we have not taken any action against them, despite them specifically developing their technology with us in mind as their target.
This is because, strategically, America is in a wonderful location, surrounded on both sides by large oceans and armed to the teeth with the fanciest defence radars and missiles that money can buy. Our tech is so advanced that the chance of anything another country throws at us harming us is incredibly slim.
So why Iran? Why was it worth it to risk and end so many lives to stop their nuclear program?
We claimed that we were acting in defense of Israel, since they would actually be within striking range of a theoretical Iranian nuclear weapon, but this would be assuming that Iran had already built a functioning, tested warhead, then produced enough of them to use as backups if one were to fail, then used tech that they have not been shown to possess to make themselves invisible to the Israeli Iron Dome missile defense system, and then after ALL of that was done, they would make the heavy decision to use nuclear warheads for the first time since 1945.
That’s a lot of assuming to justify the killing of over 200 people in Iran during these missile strikes, over 100 of which were girls between the ages of 7 and 12, when three of the missiles hit their elementary school.
Since the attacks, Iran has retaliated with more missiles and bloodshed and we are already beginning to feel the economic effects of war. The Strait of Hormuz is next to Iran and is responsible for transporting 20-30% of the entire world’s oil and gas. As of Saturday, Iran has closed it entirely, which is likely to cause oil and gas prices to skyrocket, causing Americans to pay more than we already are for things.
In addition to all of this, it is still illegal for the president to start a war without Congressional approval, as I’ve mentioned before in my Venezuela article. Declaring a war is too much power for one person to have, and it is why the Founding Fathers intentionally separated power between our three branches of government.
Yet, Congress did nothing to reprimand Trump about the Venezuela incident and I have little faith they will do anything about this one. However, when 80% of Americans are against a war, maybe our President should honor our wishes and not start one.
Again, as I said about Maduro, Iran’s government is awful and they deserve to be toppled, but is that really our problem to fix, when doing nothing has no negative impacts on our country, but getting involved could put the lives of our servicemembers stationed overseas at risk? With our economy in shambles, shouldn’t we be spending more effort on helping our own citizens instead of protecting a foreign country that continuously causes problems and has only ever really been a drain on our resources?
In short, I pray that this conflict is over quickly and does not escalate into an Iraq War 2.0. I pray for the servicemembers who are probably terrified right now. I pray for the civilians in the areas that are caught in the crossfire. I also pray for not only the US government, but also the Iranian government officials to make good choices that minimize casualties. All life is sacred, and the decision to begin a conflict that will result in the loss of any lives is something that should be taken extremely seriously, and I pray that we understand that.
Taryn Ogletree is a local small business owner and author with previous experience of several years in finance.